February
January
The first film I saw this year was the Mark Wahlberg, Kate
Beckinsale thing called Contraband. I
remember almost nothing about this, only that I saw it and tried to forget
about it. My few recollections involve Wahlberg racing against time to stop his
dear Beckinsale from being buried alive with cement in a construction site. The
film had so little aspiration and impact that for others falling into this category
I will not go into description but merely state that they were viewed. 
I recently questioned why theatre was so expensive, this was before I saw Billy Elliot on Broadway and witnessed the spectacle of a three hour show encompassing dozens of performers intricately dancing in perfectly choreographed routines whilst singing and acting. The stage design and the lighting, the orchestra, the upkeep of the glorious theatre that glowers with history and a proud sense of individuality. As many as twelve performances a week live on Broadway, in Toronto and London all year round. It is phenomenal, suddenly the steep ticket price seems rather fair, how many times can you visit the cinema and watch a three hour motion picture? And I am talking about a proper three hour picture, not Michael Bay's ludicrously long Transformers films.

Film Number 43 – Law Abiding Citizen
Gerard Butler is a top engineer, happily married with a daughter. His entire life is changed within the first 5 minutes of the film when his home is invaded and his wife and child are raped and murdered. After this shocking opening the two men responsible for the murders are on trial. It turns out that only one of the men was responsible for the murders but unfortunately that killer has made a deal with the courts to frame the other man for the crimes. As there is no evidence to convict the actual killer he goes free whilst the other guy goes on death row the. Enter Jamie Foxx a top District Attorney who is responsible for this strange verdict Butler is furious he leaves and the killer is given a jail sentence.
We jump to ten years later, the guy on death row is given a lethal injection that is tampered with and he dies in agonizing pain, whilst the other guy is set free, Butler tracks him down and cuts him into pieces. You see for the last ten years Butler has been planning the ultimate revenge on everyone that has wronged him and his family. What follows is a series of expertly planned attacks and double crosses by Butler who is doing it all from jail.
You have to give the film a lot of credit it cuts all the bullshit and jumps straight into the story; unfortunately there are two big problems. The first being Jamie Foxx, his character is completely unlikable, there isn’t really one point during the entire film when we actually want him to succeed. His delivery is fine but there is no energy or charisma to latch on to. He does however deliver my favorite line in the film, when Butler is in jail and requests his last meal he starts listing all the stuff he wants – “I’ll take the stake and the potatoes with the broccoli, gravy and pomme frites” to which Foxx responds “fuck you and your pomme frites” it doesn’t get much better than that.
The films plot becomes incredibly convoluted but it doesn’t really require too much attention, it just keeps going and going the conversations between the two are more and more tedious. Then when we think the film is out of steam a bunch of people are stayed to death by a giant tommy gun and Butler kills his cell mate by stabbing him in the neck with a steak bone. The violence in this is brutal and realistic, mostly horrible to watch. The problem is that after a while we can’t really be sympathetic for anyone, Butler becomes too brutal to be relatable and Foxx was kind of unlikable from the start. It feels a bit like a film that would get made in the seventies, gritty and violent.
In the end the film is pretty unrewarding to watch, it’s a cold story with little humanity, about twenty minutes too long thanks to character development for characters that we don’t care about.
4 and a half out of 10

Film Number 42 – A Big Hand for the Little Lady
A poker movie from 1966 today, the film concerns an annual card game in a small town where the five richest men get together and play for high stakes. They stop everything in their in their life for the game, one man stops his daughter’s wedding, a lawyer stops the closing case quickly to run away. As the game begins a small family Henry Fonda, Joanne Woodward and their son enter the barn looking for a place to stay. Unfortunately this long exposition before they get to game takes ages; a good seven to eight minutes of the five men traveling across the giant landscapes went on far too long and hurt the beginning of the film. When they get to the barn the card game is set up wonderfully the entire town’s folk gather to the barn to watch and share stories about the games’ infamy.
Henry Fonda takes a drink ends up meeting one of the players, they form a quick little friendship and the man allows him to go and watch the game, whilst watching the man realizes that these players are terrible. Fonda asks them if they can play, they agree but tell him that they play western style rules that is, if you can’t match the bet because you don’t have the money, you’re out. Ignoring his sons huge protests Fonda goes and digs into the family savings to enter the game, the action carries on Fonda’s money goes down so he clears out the family savings, sure that he can beat these people. They play until he gets the monster hand, but as he looks around everyone else seems to break their poker face in the same way. Unfortunately Fonda is nearly out of money and the bet has gone up, he puts up his watch, his horse and cart and then he makes his son watch the cards to go and get a loan from the bank.
Fonda faints, the wife takes over, the stakes get higher, and she has to try and raise more money. I’ll stop the plot here because it does get pretty fun and I don’t want to ruin it. The scenes of poker are very tame compared to what we’ve seen in films like Rounder’s; it’s almost a farcical game the obvious poker faces and silly bets, but it is fun, all the characters work so well together. The actors all have their fun quirks and qualities that make them entertaining and watchable. Fonda is a compulsive gambler, it is heartbreaking to watch him put his family’s life savings on the line. The dialogue is seamless blends in perfectly and is nice and snappy. My main problems with the film is that it takes a long time to get into the premise the film just kind of meanders around the game building up this almost godly competition that turns out to be just a very simple card game. The acting is great Henry Fonda is charming to watch we have so much empathy for him as just a simple man who is incredibly weak but also is doing it to try and better his family’s financial situation. The ending is pretty wonderful and it has been emulated so many times over the last ten years that I’d be surprised if it hits anyone of this generation very hard.
I feel ashamed saying this and it goes against my usual way of thinking but I would say that this film is completely ripe for a remake. I’m picturing a kind of It’s a mad mad mad world tale where the card game happens at the beginning is completely superfluous and just a very simple backdrop to the real story of the wife going around town trying her best to raise the money for the game.
The film isn’t brilliant but it is also much better than half of the comedies that we see today. A very misleading poster as well.
7 out of 10

Film Number 41 – Zero Effect
Beginning with all the coolness of the usual Conman film, we are introduced to Ben Stiller’s character a well educated man working for one of the world’s most infamous private detectives – the paranoid socially inept Darryl Zero (Bill Pullman). Ben Stiller is the assistant of this highly eccentric detective, we are told early on about all of his quirks and skills, Zero is a complete social recluse shutting himself away from the world in an apartment with a complex security system on the top floor of a giant building. He takes on a new intricate blackmail case from a tycoon played by Ryan O’Neil, the mission takes Zero on a series of twists and turns, he falls in love with a girl and solves the complicated case.
I won’t go too much into the plot so I can avoid spoiling it, the script is really fun, very witty and sharp dialogue, the characters are all quite captivating. Zero is a master at reading people and Pullman plays it perfectly with the right amount of bizarre nuance to separate him from every other master mind that we’ve seen on film. The only real fault of this character is that there is a lot of introduction and establishment and it does stop the story from jumping in at the beginning. The plot stays very idle in the middle when Zero starts a relationship, it’s interesting to watch but the film defiantly stays in this moment for far too long, it was important to set up this relationship but it needed to be smoother and more intertwined to the mission.
The other problem is that as the film progresses the character of Darryl Zero become so interesting and rich that no other character holds your attention. They all are strongly overshadowed by Pullman’s weird eccentricities and it kind of makes the main plot thread that isn’t about Zero a bit of a side note. The film looses it’s suave stylistic tone from the beginning and becomes more about the characters, the problem is that the film still insists on showing these long cool hip scenes of people walking with tight synchronization and by this point they have lost their effect. The plotting becomes slightly convoluted as well but it is still more than acceptable, some of the best moments are listening to Zero writing his memoirs/ journal reflecting on the case and the many new feelings he experience.
The film maybe suffers from trying to be too clever and complex, it looses the focus heading into the third act and manages to get it back right at the end. Great music choices throughout adds to the fun slick nature of the film. Ben Stiller is enjoyable as Arlo the assistant but he really is just playing it very straight, Kim Dickens is the love interest, her damaged, strong, and angry character is refreshing to watch she allows the right amount of venerability to come through to give the character empathy.
It’s an ambitious film very much about dialogue and could probably trim off ten minutes or so to help it flow but on the whole very fun enjoyable and cool.
7 and a half out of 10

Film number 40 – The Mystery Team
Fans of Derrick Comedies internet shorts have been waiting in eager anticipation for the Theatrical release of their debut film “The Mystery Team” (and by fans I mean me). The first short I saw by them was entitled “Daughters” and I’ve been hooked ever since. Unfortunately the film had a very limited release, I think it was basically one print taken around to the biggest cities, but after a year of waiting the film has finally been released on DVD.
The three main members of this comedy troupe make up the Mystery Team a group of amateur detectives that have been solving mysteries for a dime since they were seven years old. The characters are strange adult hybrids that have innocent and childish minds, going off to solve a murder the master of disguise dons a horrible fake mustache in the attempt to pass as a tycoon, sticking out his chest and talking in a comical grandiose theater voice. Most of the humor in the film is derived from these bizarre characters interacting with people who are firmly planted in the real world.
Usually when sketch comedy such as SNL tries to make the move to film it turns into a bunch of gags with a plot that has serious dips in pace and interest but Mystery Team actually works as a film, the comedy builds jokes throughout and they just get more hilarious. The characters go through wonderful transitions growing up and maturing yet still being completely oblivious to situations around them. It’s a bit like a hardcore episode of the Rugrats, just instead of Nurses and daycare centers it’s full of prostitutes and murderers in a strip club. Working out of a small stall in their front yard the Mystery Team are ready to solve almost any small blunder that has befallen the quiet suburb that they live in, they begin the film finding out who stuck their fingers inside Mrs Kibbels berry pie and move to finding out who murdered a little girl’s parents. The mystery team rides color coded bicycles with matching sneakers, they’ve never grown up each member has a special skill that they are unskillful at; the master of disguise dons wacky costumes and ridiculous personas that are completely transparent, the strongest kid in town is weak and pretends to be on the football team and the Boy Genius memorizes useless facts that he uses in the wrong situations.
The great thing about the film is that the clues that the team follow are completely nonsensical, through a series of bizarre events they actually end up going on the right path. The moments of espionage are hysterical and imaginative but also quite suspenseful; there are great scenes where the characters are in serious peril and we feel that were there with them, all the characters posses such innocence that at times you actually are worried for their safety. The acting is strong and consistent throughout; the overblown farcical characters could fall apart quite quickly but they all remain charming and entertaining. The three main actors Donald Glover, D.C. Pierson and Dominic Dierkes are all prime to be in big comedies they prove that they can go far beyond the world of sketch comedy. They all also wrote the script and it’s actually really well done the story moves well the characters are all fun and original and the film is never boring.
The supporting cast also back them up well; Park and Recreation’s Aubry Plaza is great as a romantic interest and the older sister of the orphaned girl, she’s got that kind of angry brutally down to earth funny shtick down well. Ellie Kempar from The Office is a girl version of the Mystery Team fully grown riding round the town on a Bicycle with pigtails. Action scenes are really well filmed, very thrilling and far beyond what we would expect from a comedy film with such a small budget. The dialogue is so good in the film it never feels annoying or obvious and is generally pretty surprising and different from what we usually see.
Obviously there are few weakness such as the tone being destroyed by some real gross out moments but even these are kind of funny and are usually complemented with some good dialogue anyway. Some people could easily find the film annoying and childish but the comedy works, it plays incredibly well and is very refreshing to see. It is incredibly impressive that they managed to pull this film off for such a low budget, it’s not trying to say anything profound or change lives it just wants to be entertaining and in that respect it’s a great success. We should be nurturing these comedies, rent it buy it you will laugh and it has the most foul mouthed child that you will ever see on screen.
8 out of 10

FILM NUMBER 39 – Toy Story 3
A sequel 11 years in the making bringing a 15 year Journey to the end, today is the final part in Pixar Animation Studio’s landmark debut series, one of the most anticipated films of the year – Toy Story 3. The films premise concerns the gang of Toys dealing with their owner’s lack of interest; Andy is now 18 and about to go off to college. Andy has been slowly getting rid of his toys for years leaving only a very select few of his favorites behind which conveniently are also the fan favorites as well, I’m talking about Buzz Lightyear, Woody, Slinky, Pig, Rex, Mr and Mrs Potato Head, Jessie and Bullseye, oh and those weird three eyed alien things. So being bugged by his mother to sort all his shit out Andy opts out of taking his porn and weed to college and instead decides to bring Woody with him and put the rest of the other guys in the attic instead of donating them to charity. In a nice mix up of events all the toys and a Barbie accidently end up in a children’s daycare center where they meet a ton of new toys, including a Ken doll and the leader of the bunch an old cuddle bear named Lotso.
Woody pleads with the rest of the toys to escape with him and make it back in time to Andy’s house before he leaves for college They have three days to get back but the rest of the toys think they have a pretty sweet deal at the day care center, they haven’t been played with in years and the prospects of some human interaction are quite appealing. Lotso introduces the toys to the room they will be living in which appears nice and Woody stowaways in a child’s backpack. Woody makes it to a new house and gets help from the toys there to find a route back to Andy’s, mean while the Toys back at the day care center finally realize that they are the punchbags to the young kids who have no idea how to treat toys and just enjoy smashing, throwing and slobbering all over them. When the Toy’s try to switch rooms they find out that leader Lotso is very malevolent and bitter from being abandoned years ago by his owner. He decides to lock up the Toys imprisoning them in toy boxes and putting a giant baby doll on patrol watch.
Woody gets word of his friends peril and goes to rescue them, this results in a daring long escape sequence where the toys are almost incinerated at a trash dump, before miraculously being saved, making it back it time to Andy’s to realize that they belong with a new child that will play with them. I rush through the plot, it isn’t as complex as the first two films but it is logical and sensible, it moves at pace that we know and expect from Pixar, allowing enough character development and story to come though without overloading it. If I am to cut the story to its bare bones it really is a rehash of the second film, it’s all a big mission for the toys to rescue each other and get back to their owner. Where I feel the film differs though is that it offers a logical conclusion to the lives of these characters and that isn’t to say that we get to see these lives come to an end but we do get to see a large chapter closed. It’s similar to the end of the Matrix in that we are pretty sure at the end that the characters will go on the same path with their new owner as they did with Andy.
Toy Story 3 has too many positives to even think of it as a failure, even with this notion I would say that it was the weakest of the 3 and I don’t think that is a bad thing. I mean who really says that a trilogy has to end with a giant epic conclusion; all we really want is a tidy ending for the characters that we have become attached with. In this film Pixar have paid attention to so many small details that have all worked perfectly; it seems as if every element was picked for the maximum effect. Every voice is perfect, the old favorites such as John Ratzenberger as Hamm, Don Rickles and Estelle Harris as mr and Mrs Potato Head, Wallace Shaun as Rex and of course Tom Hanks and Tim Allen as Woody and Buzz are great and entertaining to hear again. There are also some great new additions; Michael Keaton as Ken is wonderful, all the right enthusiasm and the cheesy pitch that we would expect from a Ken Doll. Ned Beaty is well cast as the evil Lotso bear, you can sense something strange about him from the start but it is subtle enough to dismiss. It is also a true testament to the integrity of Pixar that they don’t rely on these voices to sell the film, their Dreamworks counterparts always seem far too enthusiastic to highlight the expensive voice actors that they managed to get. Pixar pick the right voice for the right character and it always works very effectively, never feels out of place and is generally quite memorable.
The quality of animation has also reached entirely new heights; I saw the film in 3-d and whilst I can’t say that it is necessary to view in this format at all I did feel like the 3-d added a great depth of field to the shots. Another huge plus with the film was the amazing camera movement, yes granted there is no camera but every shot moves so perfectly allowing every action scene to be observed fully by the viewer leaving no moments of unsynchronized awe (something most normal films are still unable to handle). Pixar have this great skill of being able to emulate the perfect shot and movement for a scene, a big example being the dance scene during the closing credits, every close up and pan is spot on. Randy Newman’s music creates a wonderful backdrop to throughout, he has obviously re-recorded some tracks and he throws more emotion in than ever before.
It’s funny I always expected myself to be very excited about this film but as soon as I saw the first trailer my interest was lost. I knew the film was on its way and I wasn’t excited until the lights went down and the short film “Night and Day” began, I relised that I was almost sad to watch these characters go. This feeling is prominent throughout the film, when is it ok to hang on to something when do have to finally give something away? It’s a heavy issue that hits deep and watching the film I felt like Andy I’m glad to see these characters journey come to an end because one more venture with them would definitely be one too many. Pixar are very successful about making you feel like a child again whilst delivering a nice heavy message that puts you into a huge state of personal reflection, people could talk for hours about why their films manage to resonate with such a large audience but in the end it probably just comes down to the fact that they are full of so much heart.
They believe in putting on a good show and so far this year I’d say no one does it better.
9 out of 10

Film Number 38 – Please Give
An independent comedy today directed by Nicole Holofcener who made 2006’s Friends with Money. Now I didn’t see that film but money seems to be a very big theme for this director, Please Give is essentially a movie all about the many types of white guilt that can exist. Kate (Catherine Keneer) and Alex (Oliver Platt) run a furniture store in New York where they buy used stuff at estate sales then research the piece and hike up the price astronomically. Even with this successful enterprise Kate is very wary about giving her angry teen daughter Abby (Sarah Steele) horrendous sums of money like other well off parents. To make herself feel a bit better Kate does her best to help homeless people out, gives to charities and constantly tries to help at youth groups and just general be a decent person. To further add to their entrepreneurial actions Kate and Alex decide to buy their neighbors’ apartment to knock through and create a luxury place. The only catch is that the tenant, a bitter angry old women called Andra, will not leave the apartment until she dies. Her health has been deteriorating for years and she has been helped by her granddaughter Rebecca (Rebecca Hall). Rebecca spends her days working as a breast cancer reduction technologist in a very depressing clinic; she seems full of good ethics and morals and spends her lonely days caring for her miserable grandmother. Her sister Mary (Amanda Peet) is nearly the complete antithesis, self centered, mean, cruel, bitter, rude and unaware.
As the film progresses the overweight aging Oliver Platt cheats on his wife and begins an affair with the gorgeous young Amanda Peet. Now this is a pretty hard jump to make in this plot, they try to give Peet some motivation for the affair by having her recently dumped by a boyfriend but it is very hard to believe that she has no better option then having an affair with this man. This is really the only part that’s a bit hard to grasp, the good thing however is that Platt doesn’t really have a clue why he is having the affair. This is a real strength of the film, it could easily be clichéd if they had a horribly dysfunctional marriage and home life but this family actually seems very happy and it makes the predicament all the more realistic and confusing.
The whole film is full of bittersweet and touching moments that are hard for me in my caveman state of being to touch on why I felt the pain or the joy. There is a particular instance where Catherine Keneer goes to volunteer with a group dealing with disabled children, whilst there she is unable to contain herself and bursts into tears, rather than have her tell us why she is sad all the power is allowed to come from the actions. Rebecca Hall’s beautiful and depressed character is allowed to come out of her shell and find a boyfriend and feel more confident, this is handled so beautifully and sweetly as well and never gets artificial. Whilst Peet’s character begins the way she started with very little personal growth, certainly makes a change from the barrage of epiphanies within the film and cinema in general.
The film moves at a decent pace and when the old lady finally dies it’s very refreshing that we are not dragged down in this moment for eternity and the story moves on in a timely fashion. Of course the film defiantly aims to throw a great deal of questions, points and messages to the viewer, nothing really hit me very hard and I actually think that’s a good thing, I’m getting kinda sick of films that revel in making the audience feel as guilty as possible for whatever privileges that they have in life. The film also shares an important message that shitty things are always going to be in the world and that we can’t solve them all, we get to see Kate’s life ruled by her guilt, every action she makes is marred with its effect on others, she is constantly stressed and worried all the time.
A real character study here, not something where I can really talk about dynamic filmmaking, it serves its purpose as a thought provoking and entertaining little indie comedy. Whilst I do not agree with every single message put forward I can really respect the ways that it does show the ideas in a subtle respectful nature. Acting is all very high quality honestly can’t pull a bad name out of the hat, everyone put their best in and made it work.
7 out of 10








